Page 1 of 1

3D video model of the original USS Enterprise NCC-1701

PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 7:43 pm
by Jeff T
For those that grew up enjoying the original series or those that discovered it in syndication, this is quite the treat: an opportunity to see an animated deck-by-deck visual layout of the Enterprise.

This 3D animation was created using Franz Joseph's detailed schematics of the Enterprise from the 1970's as a reference.

Star Trek: Very detailed 3D model of the USS Enterprise NCC-1701. Part 1:  Deck 1-11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QF-8n1-3qI

Star Trek: Very detailed 3D model of the USS Enterprise NCC-1701. Part 2:  Deck 9-24 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCRaq-DV-po


Here is another video available. Some of the information is repeated, like providing scale references.

Star Trek: Inside the USS Enterprise NCC-1701 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyf6auv-jMk&list=PLWgHRiBLYqygis9CnKyNaqOM0mi4QiWrc

Hope you enjoy these videos and provide your thoughts if inspired. :-)

Re: 3D video model of the original USS Enterprise NCC-1701

PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2022 7:54 pm
by Sorripto
That is incredible with all the little details. I can't quite get past how he says seventeen o' one instead of one seven o' one, but not enough to take away from how detailed all that stuff is. 

Re: 3D video model of the original USS Enterprise NCC-1701

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 6:36 pm
by Battle Lion
Sorripto wrote:That is incredible with all the little details. I can't quite get past how he says seventeen o' one instead of one seven o' one, but not enough to take away from how detailed all that stuff is. 


I and everyone i've know always said it 'seventeen oh one', maybe its a generational divide thing?

Re: 3D video model of the original USS Enterprise NCC-1701

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 7:49 pm
by Jeff T
Battle Lion wrote:
Sorripto wrote:That is incredible with all the little details. I can't quite get past how he says seventeen o' one instead of one seven o' one, but not enough to take away from how detailed all that stuff is. 


I and everyone i've know always said it 'seventeen oh one', maybe its a generational divide thing?


To chime in… I’ve always identified the Enterprise as NCC seventeen oh one (17 01) as well. Fascinating! Lol ;-)

Re: 3D video model of the original USS Enterprise NCC-1701

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2022 9:45 pm
by Sorripto
Jeff T wrote:
Battle Lion wrote:
Sorripto wrote:That is incredible with all the little details. I can't quite get past how he says seventeen o' one instead of one seven o' one, but not enough to take away from how detailed all that stuff is. 


I and everyone i've know always said it 'seventeen oh one', maybe its a generational divide thing?


To chime in… I’ve always identified the Enterprise as NCC seventeen oh one (17 01) as well. Fascinating! Lol ;-)


In all my years in the Navy we always said each number individually, and I am fairly confident that is how they said it in the show too. I am shocked, and honestly quite amused if I have been wrong for nearly 40 years, that saying NCC one seven o' one is not the norm.

Re: 3D video model of the original USS Enterprise NCC-1701

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2022 3:37 am
by Kheren
Agreed Sorripto. I have no recollection of any instance ever of any canon-saying other than N-C-C-1-7-0-1, even with bloody A, B, C or D

I can tell you that it's the same thing in the Canadian Navy, according to my late father (who was a huge Star Trek fan). And I have friends in police forces that can confirm they always say each letter (ususally as a name like Norman-Charlie-Charlie) then each number individually, never bunched up as it could bring confusion if comm is not 5/5 (seventeen could sound like seventy for example).

Re: 3D video model of the original USS Enterprise NCC-1701

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2022 11:26 am
by Jeff T
Apparently this has been a discussion for quite some time now.
Here's an example: https://www.reddit.com/r/startrek/comments/43tpns/sort_of_a_poll_do_you_say_onesevenohone_or/

There isn't even full agreement on the end: Oh one or zero one  ;-)